Home   >   Music   >   Jean Michel Jarre - Les Chants Magnet...
Jean Michel Jarre - Les Chants Magnetiques
Click photo to enlarge

Jean Michel Jarre - Les Chants Magnetiques

Facts

Les Chants Magnetiques
Music Price: $10.98
As of Sep 3 19:48 EDT (details)

Buy from Amazon.co.ukBuy from Amazon.co.uk
Artist(s)Jean Michel Jarre
StudioDreyfus
Release DateMay 1, 1994
UPC Code764911614229
Buy this item$10.98 at Amazon.com
As of Sep 3 19:48 EDT (details)
1 Audio CD, Usually ships in 24 hours,
 

Tracks

  1. Les Chants Magnetiques Part 1
  2. Les Chants Magnetiques Part 2
  3. Les Chants Magnetiques Part 3
  4. Les Chants Magnetiques Part 4
  5. Les Chants Magnetiques Part 5

Similar CDs

The Symphonic Jean-Michel JarreThe Complete OxygeneOxygene: Live In Your Living RoomAeroTéo and Téa
The Symphonic Jean-Michel JarreThe Complete OxygeneOxygene: Live In Your Living RoomAeroTéo and Téa

 

User Reviews

Average user review: 4.5 (17 reviews)

rating: 5 QuoteA classicQuote
I you like Jarre, this is another classic. His later work never was better than his first 3 albums: Oxygene, Equinox and this one, Les Chantes Magnetiques. I gave 5 stars to all these 3 albums. January 12, 2008

rating: 5 QuoteHis third album and still going strong.Quote
The best way to start to buy Jean Michel Jarre albums, is to start with his greatest achievements. "Oxygene" (1976), "Equinoxe" (1978), "Les Chants Magnetiques (Magnetic Fields)" (1981), and then jump to "Chronologie" (1993).

One thing that I loved about the 1970's is that artists all had the liberty to do whatever they wanted to do. Nobody was told that they had to make music that sounded like whatever was popular at the time. If you were really different, then you were given that chance to expressive your own new concept of sound art. Today, if you try to do something different, then you get immediately categorized, and probably end up in the "not likely to sell" file. Today, record companies seem to be very selective on what they are willing to invest in and record. That's probably why we have so many independent labels now. The big recording industries like Columbia, Capitol, and RCA are probably just relying on the sales of repackage hits of their former successful artists.

Anyway, Jean Michel Jarre was one of the outsiders who was entering the spacy soundscape concept similar to Tangerine Dream, Klaus Schulze, Tomita, Mike Oldfield, and even Vangelis. I love the innovators of electronic music of the seventies, and Jean Michel Jarre became my favorite when I first started buying CD's in the eighties. The new compact disc concept was perfect for re-introducing electronic music. The album of "Oxygene" was one of my first CD's that I bought in 1984. Then I bought "Equinoxe" and then this album. I've never played another cassette tape again, although I've made cassette tape recording to give to friends so I could introduce them to Jean Michel Jarre, and other electronic artists, too.


However, Jean Michel Jarre must truly have been struggling these passed 15 years. He has his own unique sound, and yet he's been trying to stay alive for more than 30 years. I can see his confusion though. His most loyal fans have a particular expectation of what music he creates. And nobody can be expected to just continue to do the same thing over and over again. "Oxygene", "Equinoxe", and "Magnetic Fields" were the albums that set the stage for what was Jarre's fabulous unique sound. But, all through his career he seemed to want to re-create himself. He did a weird soundtrack album in 1973 called "Les Granges Brulees" which only recently got released on CD a couple of years ago. I didn't like it and I'm sure Jarre himself is not too fond of it. However, in 1976, his illustrious career began with "Oxygene", which is probably still his most famous album. Anyone who has "Oxygene" probably has "Equinoxe" as well. Anything he released after this, we couldn't wait to buy. Then, he caught us all off guard in 1984 with "Zoolook" This took a little while to grow on me, but eventually, it did. It also made me a little hesitant about his next album. In 1986, he put out "Rendez-vous" and redeemed himself, and our expectations. Then, it seemed like he was beginning to get sloppy. He has released a lot of live albums and I thought that he was just killing time with all those unnecessary releases. I enjoy 1982's "The Concerts in China", and I've kept his other double live CD of 1994's "Hong Kong". But he has several other live albums that just seemed to repeat the same sound as the previous studio releases, but with half-hearted applause from the listening audience.

In 1988, his album "Revolutions" had some great short passages, and then some rather dumb child-like sound concepts. Then in 1990, his album "Waiting for Cousteau" had two fabulous instrumentals called "Calypso 2 and 3" (I didn't care for Calypso 1") and then his title track is his first truly ambient sound passage. He did a nearly 47 minute soundscape which simulated lying on the ocean floor and listening to the sounds of passing sea mammals and other underwater sound effects. I do like it, but I gotta be in the mood to listen to it. When I'm tired and I want to sit in the dark and listen to something, this track is pretty soothing and relaxing.

Then, in 1993, he puts out an album called "Chronologie". To me this is his greatest album since his first three albums. This is one of my top five favorite albums from Jean Michel Jarre. I was thinking: "Yes! The Jean Michel Jarre that we all knew, is back!" But, then, after this album, I think Jarre was beginning to get confused. He didn't quite do anything for a while. Maybe he was basking in the glow of his new latest sound achievement, and now he didn't know how to follow up on it. Two years afterwards, he releases another double live album called "Hong Kong". I like it because he incorporated a band to add more energy to his familiar music of the past and so it was nice to hear a concert that featured the music of all his best albums. I wish this concert was filmed for video. What a loss that is.

A year later, somebody tampers with Jarre's music and created a various remix album called "Jarremix". I don't think Jarre had much participation in creating these remixes other that just the rhythms of certain tracks. This is another CD that I have to be in the mood for. I seldom ever care to play this CD.

With Jarre suddenly realizing that he's tapped into a multitude of different directions, he came to a halt on his creativity. So, check this out. In 1997, he releases an album called "Oxygene 7 -13". This album sounds like he's trying to resell his most cherished album by simulating some of the sounds of the original album. It's a keeper, but I don't know why Jarre felt like he had to do this. Maybe he knew that it couldn't help but sell well because he IS Jean Michel Jarre and "Oxygene" WAS he greatest selling album. You know, Mike Oldfield did this too. In 1973, his first album "Tubular Bells" was his greatest selling album, with his career continuing a moderate downward direction of appeal, in 1992 he released an album called "Tubular Bells 2" which brought his earlier fan base back (including me). And in 1998, he even did a "Tubular Bells 3" and then he did "Tubular Bells 2003" which proves that he has lost his grip with what he wants to put out for his fan base. Anyway, I was wondering if Jarre was going to put out an album called "Equinoxe 9 - 17". He may as well, I'm sure it would sell.

I have mixed opinions about Jarre's new millenium album called "Metamorphoses". The long album side soundscapes are no more. He's starting to stick to just a bunch of short songs. And he incorporates female voices in many of the songs. It's hit and miss with these tunes. Mostly miss. Then he comes out with "Sessions 2000". This album does not sound like Jean Michel Jarre at all. This whole boring concept sounds like the sounds you could invent in your own head if you were sitting forever in a waiting room, or you were in silent solitary confinement. Then his next album "Geometry of Love" continued the same dull concept. Two bland, boorish, CD's in a row and neither one even worthy of being released in a regular jewel case.

Yes, the days of Jarre's greatest moments are all truly over. I believe it ended with "Chonologie." If you're new to hearing Jean Michel Jarre's music, start with "Oxygene", "Equinoxe", "Les Chants Magnetiques (Magnetic Fields)," and the "Chronolgie". You won't be disappointed. But it's up to you where you go from there.

September 30, 2007

rating: 5 Quotestill goodQuote
Electronic tunes at their best. Listen to this and chill. I still chill with this after all these years. June 10, 2007

rating: 5 QuoteNumber Four's a classicQuote
This is Jarre's fourth album (the third being Les Concerts en Chine), but it's offically the third STUDIO album - hence the misconception. As others have pointed out, it's Jarre's first foray into digital synthesizer, but that doesn't make it any less a substantial piece of work. And yeah, there is the odd-ball piece of circus organ music at the end, but as any serious Jarre fan knows, he did that because he always had a thing about circus organs when he was a kid. He clearly explains that in his documentary on Oxygene Moscow. Don't rip the album because you personally didn't like or agree with his inspiration and chioce of a last track. find out the reasons WHY he did that. It's not like they guy just decided he needed filler material... November 7, 2006

rating: 4 QuoteChants MagnetiquesQuote
Chants Magnetiques~ Jean-Michel Jarre is a good album but it is not anywhere close to his first two albums. Oxygene and Equinox are much more consistent. Magnetic Fields has some nice tracks but the keyboard sounds are terrible compared to the first two albums. I know that this was one of the first albums to use digital keyboards and for the most part it sounds like using protoype keyboards and that is not a good thing. Jarre is here steering a bit too much in the realm of art for arts sake and it does sound a bit too avantgarde at times, but still nowhere close to the zoolook disaster that he releases some years later. On the whole a pretty decent album that lacks consistency and could have been so much better but it is alright and gets 4 stars.
March 14, 2006

More reviews at Amazon.com ...