Mozart at Tanglewood

Do not hesitate, buy it!

KV622 has been and will continue to be an exploited concert, due to it's magnificency, it's lovely second movement and that it represents maybe the highest of all Mozart concerts for woodwind.

BG plays, once again, more from the heart than from the precission point-of-view, but it's a professional and loving approach to this most have concert.

The quintet is also great, but alongside the concert, it's just overwhelmed. August 16, 2008

jazz goes classic

You know I'm a hard core jazz fan and a jazz musicican. I like to know how many classical jazz clarinet players can play jazz let alone if they can play as good as Benny...? none.

How many Jazz musicians can play classical...? so many.

I bought this Cd only to show my students that jazz musicians are masters in their instruments...may be except the violin.

for Piano, listen to Art Tatum...I rest my case.

I have listened to these compositions many times from different classical performers and I like most of them. Yes BG sounds very different.... so what..? I aslo like classical music very much...but can't take the classical so called high arcy thrashing thier own music for the sake of being above ordinary...you classical peopole out there should learn somthing from jazz fans...be quite and listen to the music...

thia is a great recording ...buy it. February 14, 2006

Remembering Benny in classical music....

I saw Benny Goodman play in person in 1967. The first half of the program was the Weber Clarinet Concerto (which he never recorded); the second half was the Goodman quartet and sextet with Teddy Wilson and Gene Krupa. I absolutely loved his warm yet penetrating tone, even more beautiful in person than it was on the old 78s. Then I heard this recording of the Mozart concerto on LP and was enchanted all over again.

Over the years, however, I have had arguments with clarinet students over the "correctness" or "aptness" of Benny's playing in classical. They hate his tone, call it either thin or woody (depending on how much they hate him), but I have heard many many "correct" clarinetists since and have always found their tones to be chilly and cold. I'm sorry, but I don't appreciate an icy-sounding clarinet tone. I'm too spoiled by Johnny Dodds, Jimmy Noone, Artie Shaw, Ed Hall and Benny to put up with that! (Just as no classical trombonist can compete with Tommy Dorsey, Britt Woodman, Lawrence Brown, Jack Teagarden or J.J. Johnson!)

I admit that Benny fluffs a few notes, especially in the first movement. Recording classical music was always nerve-wracking for Goodman: on the famous Toscanini performance of "Rhapsody in Blue," Benny the perfectionist cracks the top note, and playing with Charles Munch and the Boston Symphony was bound to be somewhat uncomfortable for him. But the bottom line is not "how technically perfect is Goodman?" but rather, "how does the music sound?" And to my ears the music sounds damn fine. I have a legitimate classical clarinetist, Robert Oppenheim, playing the quintet with the Budapest String Quartet on Columbia, and though I like that version very much it is only because the Budapest quartet is more "together" than the Boston Symphony Quartet heard here, not because Oppenheim plays that much better than Benny Goodman.

So stop griping and just enjoy it, for crying out loud!!!!! October 26, 2004

Brilliant and should get 6 stars

Brilliant and slightly different: I think that the BG version is something Mozart would have approved of. Music is all about interpretation and as a musician I beleive that BG was the greatest ever all round clarinet player. This might not be technically perpect but hey, don't knock it 'till you've tried it. It is wonderful, if only limited by the recording technology available in the mid fifties. This is my favourite CD. May 21, 2004

awful'n'lousy

With all due respect to BG's jazz work, this is one of the [worst] recorded interpretations of Mozart's clarinet concerto.
Get Robert Marcellus! May 20, 2002

More reviews at Amazon.com ...