|  | THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO CUM |  |
I remember walking into the local record store and seeing the 1ST LP jump out of the shelves at me; I mean you just couldn't ignore a cover like that! With that in mind, I immediately picked it up and left. Short of the first MC5 LP, the Stooges, and discovering beer, I can't think of anything more important in my musical education. Combining Chuck Berry 50's riffage, early 60's girl group arrangements, and yes, good ol' RnR, the Dolls helped pave the way to the Punk world along with the Stooges and the MC5. Thunders guitar inspired 1000's of new guitarist in the punk world, out to set the world on fire. I mean, how many guitarist attitude actually comes through their playing on vinyl? Not many. And Jerry Nolan; man what a drummer's drumer. The dude was all over the place; a controlled Keith Moon at the least. Even though this LP was the first album, the next one, "TOO MUCH, TOO SOON" was even better for me; Shadow Morton's slightly creepy polished to the bone production makes it a keeper for the ages. The band never got their dues when they were starting; it seems this stuff took years to perk. All hail rock n'roll...and the NEW YORK DOLLS
September 29, 2006 |  | Typical Of Their Era, Hardly Ahead Of Their Time |  |
I too recall reading a lot about the New York Dolls in CREEM, HIT PARADER, & CIRCUS Magazines back during the era of their two albums. They recieved a lion's share of press in all the major rock magazines and then some. At the time, in the early to mid-70's - I totally avoided any rock groups that dressed like drag queens with the teased hair, makeup, spandex, etc. cos their image alone made them questionable to me and I preferred the much better sounding music of mainstream rocker dude type bands. I did like an occasional David Bowie and Kiss track though. I can see now where all the image influence of the 1980's metal banger bands - Motley Crue, Ratt, Etc. - which I refer to as drag queen rockers, got their inspiration. I had never heard any of New York Dolls music till now though. Is this what all the fuss was about?!!! It gives one a great perspective [years later] while exploring their reissued music, that they were not "ahead of their time" as implied by their fans, but more typically along the line, musically, of what David Bowie & Kiss[who were a safer and more conservative bet at the time on several levels]were hashing out on the recording front. Definitely so, musically, - BOWIE & KISS were already covering/breaking that ground and gained the mass appeal, commercial success. Whenever a heralded 'critics' darling' band fails to ignite the expected commercial success and fall to 'cult status', they are usually lamented as "well ahead of their time", which in reality is not the case. In music, there is an audience and room for everyone and for preferred musical taste, and there is a vast and expansive field of sounds in the music spectrum in each respective era. NEW YORK DOLLS 70's recordings sound okay, nothing memorable nor classic here, just trash rock, yet they paved the way for those 80's rockers and possibly Boy George to gain mass acceptance of their respective visual kinky sides.
September 8, 2006I suppose if you were the Layman you would appreciate this delicate orientation of "music." But perhaps you are no such man, perhaps you have sense enough to care about what makes music a musical masterpiece of music that was barely even music anymore, it was a medium that was anything but medium. In reality, this is unacceptably horrible. This collection of cynical rollin rock is just a collection of analagous figurines, rolling in the bridges of New York's slums.
Yes, this is music. HOWEVER. music is not always listenable, and food is not always edible. Think about that for awhile, and watch your mind wallow.
The New York Dolls were nothing more that a bunch of guys playing music. And that doesn't mean anything to a person like me, a person who UNDERSTANDS things in their proper medium, and this is NOT the proper medium for anyone with ears.
True, the New York Dolls are percieved to be flying through the decaying wilderness of our respective minds, but, if we are to accept them, then we are meant to defy the truth of reality. Maybe once we ignore the peril of diversity, we can understand the trugh of music in its misty arfful decadence. Only if we dive beyond the symphony of apathy can we understand why this is not, a Master of the 20th Century
January 29, 2005 |  | This was America's best glam band |  |
They may have only made two proper albums, but anyone who heard them fell in love with the New York Dolls. They came to conquer with power chords and panty hose. They played a hyperventilating trashy mutant blues and flaunted their unsophisticated style like the substance soaked louts that they were.
But this compilation serves them grandly. Taking five songs from each record and one rarity, it gives you a fine 11 song overview of the Dolls at their madcap and raunchy best. You can hear the Girl Group/50's rock roots in "Showdown," the blues in "Trash," plus their own ahead of the times originality on their best song, "Personality Crisis." Lead singer David Johansen had the swagger of Jagger and the campiness of too many nights in Manhattan Bars, best shown in the Dolls' cover of "Stranded In The Jungle." Johnny Thunders and Syl Sylvain made twin guitar thunder and the late Arthur Kane played his bass like a mad bomber, while Jerry Nolan was probably one of the best drummers of the NYC Scene.
But the Dolls were ultimately more than the sum of their parts, which is why the booze/heroin laden implosion stopped them all cold (save Johansen). I may not be the biggest fan of the Millennium Series, but in the case of The New York Dolls, this one of the good ones.
December 16, 2004 |  | Crazy Glammed-Out Punk Rock |  |
A strange melting pot was brewing in New York in the early 70's. A group of guys decided they would mix the glam rock of the day(David Bowie, Sweet) with the heavy metal of the day(Led Zeppelin, KISS) and the quasi-punk(Iggy and the Stooges.) What a strange brew. Punk rock and glam are the obvious influences, but ther is some heavy metal thrown in there, too. It's obvoius where Nikki Sixx of the Crue got that hairdo. It was from Johnny Thunders of the Dolls! Although this kind of music isn't exactly my taste, I fugure it's pretty good.
May 20, 2004More reviews at Amazon.com ...