Peaches - Impeach My Bush
Facts
| Artist(s) | Peaches |
| Studio | Xl Recordings |
| Release Date | July 11, 2006 |
| UPC Code | 634904020125 |
| Buy this item | $14.98 at Amazon.com As of Nov 19 10:17 EST (details) 1 Audio CD, Usually ships in 24 hours, |
Tracks
- Fuck or Kill
- Tent In Your Pants
- Hit It Hard
- Boys Wanna Be Her
- Downtown
- Two Guys (For Every Girl)
- Rock The Shocker
- You Love It
- Slippery Dick
- Give'er
- Get It
- Do Ya
- Stick It To The Pimp
Similar CDs
User Reviews
Average user review:| Solid Electro Beats with Cool Vocals; Sometimes Lyrics Lacking |
This album is solid all the way through in terms of music. The electro beats hit home on almost every track. Her vocals shift back and forth betweeen rapping/talking and singing at some points and it's a great balance.
My main criticism of this album is the lyrics. I feel like Peaches was a bit more intelligent about her sexuality earlier on. Somehow she managed to shock and mess with people without losing her witty edge.
The lyrics on this album don't seem as witty. She figured out her formula and got a bit lazy with it. She's more obvious and outspoken about what she's saying (i.e. "Two Guys For Every Girl") but she is also relying on overdone avenues of shock value, like the appropriately and lamely titled "Rock the Shocker." There were a couple of songs I deleted because the lyrics were kinda lame.
There's still a lot of great songs on this album to make it worthwhile, and there's no one out there like Peaches. It's certainly worth picking up. July 17, 2008
| like sexified candy |
| Entertaining |
| Best thing I've heard in a long time... |
It's very hip-hop oriented, but Peaches puts a serious spin on a usual genre and makes it into a personally sexual, powerful, and oftentimes humourous climax.
Peaches is definitely a force to be reckoned with (and she's a cool musician, too). May 12, 2007
| Good not too clean fun!! |
For me Peaches gives a feel like she's the evolution of the ground broken by people such as Madonna, women owning their sexuality and having and taking some control of it, empowerment. Is there're anything wrong with a woman being explicit about what they want? I reckon not.
It may be cheeky and some may find it confrontational or whatever but they're not normally people who are worth investing time or energy in. Those who don't enjoy a woman being a Woman are generally people who are more comfortable with a situation where a woman has her wings clipped, can't release her fire-breathing, lust driven, wild self. The people who would be challenged by this album are probably more comfortable in situations where a woman is controlled, forced to be compliant, where her fantasy self is crippled and she never gets to have her full self. I'd rather be in a world full of `Peaches people' than a world where repression, limitation, rape, domestic violence would be seen as `just an unfortunate reality in life'.
Peaches doesn't give the feel of lots of others who demanded their female selves, those who were beaten and trashed for their choices, often finishing up O.D.ing on the gear, living through the horrors of resisting `the norm' and all else that were the costs of wanting to have their entire selves. Hers is more a celebration of a sense of completeness as a sexual orgasmic free woman than the angst of the cost to want to be that. So, I'll sacrifice my male fantasies of a subservient, monogamous, compliant, female if it means there's more like Peaches, who can embrace their every part without having to sound like Janis (bless her soul!!) or any of the others who went before who could only try to own their full selves by risking sacrificing everything to have it. Maybe Peaches is a sign that we have in fact at least made a little bit of progress somewhere in the last decades. I hope so.
Cheers
Lloyd
May 12, 2007
More reviews at Amazon.com ...
